CHI @ WAS

It’s Bears vs. Commanders under the lights. Two teams with something to prove, and I’ve found the soft spots the market missed… in two minutes or less.

#6 - J. Daniels: O 34.5 Rushing Yards

Jayden Daniels is built for this matchup. He owns a league-high 11.5% scramble rate vs man coverage, and the Bears just happen to play man at the 2nd-highest rate in football. That’s a recipe for chaos and exactly the kind of coverage that forces mobile quarterbacks to escape and turn broken plays into chunk runs. He’s already cleared 39+ rushing yards in every start this season, showing his floor is as high as most quarterbacks’ ceiling.

But Chicago’s defense actually makes this number even more appealing. They’ve quietly become more disciplined against the pass, holding Dak Prescott and Geno Smith to modest outputs, yet that success came with a cost: their man-heavy coverage leaves massive lanes open when plays break down. It’s also worth noting that the Bears have allowed an 81.8% completion rate and 10.5 yards per attempt on play action, both ranking 31st in the league, which means linebackers are consistently getting pulled out of position, opening clear paths for Daniels to run. And with Washington carrying one of the highest team totals of the week, game flow supports aggression.

So when you combine man coverage tendencies, wide running lanes, and a dual-threat quarterback who thrives in chaos, this number feels off. Daniels doesn’t need designed runs, he creates his own. Against this defense, he should break 34.5 rushing yards comfortably by halftime.

#5 - J. Croskey-Merritt: O 59.5 Rush + Rec Yards

Jacory Croskey-Merritt is fresh off a breakout where he handled nearly 70% of Washington’s backfield touches, turning them into 150 total yards and 2 touchdowns. He’s been one of the league’s most efficient young runners, ranking 3rd in explosive run rate (10+ yards), 10th in first downs per carry, and 17th in overall success rate among running backs with at least 30 carries. This isn’t a small-sample fluke, the workload trend and usage spike are real.

But this week’s matchup takes it to another level. Chicago’s defense has been shredded by every backfield they’ve faced, giving up the most yards per carry (6.1) and the 3rd-worst rushing success rate in football. They’re also 30th in rushing fantasy points allowed to backfields, meaning they bleed production both on the ground and through the air. Meanwhile, Washington’s rushing offense is elite, ranking 1st in rushing success rate (51.1%), and they’re running the ball on nearly 46% of offensive plays, 8th-highest in the NFL. Croskey-Merritt also dominates outside runs, an area where Chicago has been gashed repeatedly due to poor edge containment.

So this is as clean a strength on weakness matchup as it gets, the most efficient young runner in football against the league’s softest run defense. Add in home-field advantage and one of the top scoring environments of the week (27.25 implied points), and 59.5 yards looks laughably low. Everything points to another big game for Washington’s new workhorse.

#4 - R. Odunze: O 8.5 Targets

Rome Odunze is already commanding elite usage in Chicago’s offense. He ranks 12th in target share (26.7%) and 8th in air yards share (40.1%), meaning he’s not just getting volume, he’s getting valuable volume. Against man coverage, Odunze has been uncoverable, drawing a target on 43.5% of routes with an insane 4.17 yards per route run, both elite marks by any standard. When defenses blitz, Caleb Williams looks his way even more, Odunze owns a 38.7% target share vs the blitz, which cements him as the first read whenever the pocket collapses.

But this week’s opponent amplifies all of those strengths. Washington plays top 10 in man coverage frequency, the exact look Odunze consistently dominates. They also rank 8th in pressure rate, meaning Caleb Williams will have to get the ball out fast, and Odunze’s precision routes become his safest option. With Chicago projected to trail (as 4.5-point underdogs), volume should rise, especially since the Bears already pass at a top 10 rate (56.4%) and average 62 offensive plays per game, giving Odunze ample opportunity to hit double-digit looks.

So with man coverage that fits his strengths, blitz pressure that feeds his usage, and a consistent role as the offense’s alpha, Odunze’s target projection feels like a free square. This is the perfect storm for volume, and 8.5 targets looks way too low for the Bears’ most reliable playmaker.

#3 - C. Williams: U 249.5 Passing Yards

Caleb Williams has shown flashes of brilliance, but his week-to-week volatility makes this number tough to trust. He’s alternated between QB1 and QB24 finishes this season, largely because his accuracy completely crumbles under pressure. He currently owns the highest inaccurate throw rate in the league (16.9%) and averages just 4.3 yards per attempt under pressure (29th). That’s a problem against a defense built specifically to disrupt timing.

But Washington isn’t just any front, they’re 8th in overall pressure rate (40%), and when they get home, they’ve held opposing quarterbacks to just 5.5 yards per attempt (12th) and a 48.1% completion rate (15th). They blitzed Williams at the 2nd-highest rate of his entire career the last time these teams met, generating pressure on 62.5% of his dropbacks, the highest he’s ever faced in a single game. Nothing in Chicago’s offensive structure has fixed that issue, their tackle rotation remains unstable, and Williams continues to drift under duress, relying on risky throws outside of structure.

So unless Washington forgets how to rush the passer overnight, this matchup is tailor-made to expose every one of Williams’ weaknesses. The Bears’ offense lives and dies by protection, and against this front, that’s bad news. Everything in this data says the same thing: 249.5 is way too high.

#2 - M. Gay: O 5.5 Kicking Points

Washington has been one of the most efficient scoring teams in football, ranking 8th in points per game and top 10 in yards per possession. Their offense has also been exceptional on early downs, ranking 3rd in early-down efficiency, which consistently puts them in scoring position. Combine that with a 27.25 implied team total (top 8 for Week 6), and you’ve got an offense built for volume, not variance.

But the key factor here is Chicago’s defensive structure. The Bears are allowing the lowest third-down conversion rate in the NFL (29.3%), meaning even efficient drives often stall in field goal range. That dynamic perfectly benefits the kicker, since Washington’s offense can move the ball effectively (averaging 6.4 yards per play on early downs, 3rd best) but might struggle to finish off drives against a bend-don’t-break defense. The Commanders also fail to earn a first down on only 20.4% of drives (4th best), proof that consistency and volume are on Gay’s side.

So when you have one of the most efficient offenses facing a defense that tightens on third down, the result is simple: more field goal attempts. Gay should have multiple scoring chances in what projects as a steady, high-possession game. This number feels like a lock for one of the most reliable offenses in the league.

Tap HERE for my #1 Pick

That’s the list. Lock it in and let Monday night cook.

As promised, in two minutes or less.

See you out there,

-Joe

P.S. You can get a free $20 (no deposit necessary) on SLEEPER if you sign up using code HOLKA9